Data 2026-09-04 18:35 · USD/CNY 6.74
中文
← Sinan LabImage · Video › HappyHorse
Video · model family

Relay effective prices for HappyHorse

Per-second / per-call effective prices for HappyHorse at 4 relay sites. No official reference price yet, so quotes are listed without ratios. Featured versions: —. Data 2026-09-04; every number carries a fetch snapshot.

Explore in the image · video ledger →
Official reference price
Official pricing not integrated
Relay sites
4 sites · 11 rows
Featured —; 0 older-version rows collapsed
Effective price range
$0.002 – $0.240
per second, median $0.002
Price within range
0 sites
Below cost floor 0 · unverified 0

Featured versions · 11 rows

Relay sitesVersionEffectiveRatioHow to read
infai.cc
happyhorse-1.1-r2v
0.002$/callNo reference
yansd666.top
happyhorse-1.1-r2v
0.002$/callNo reference
infai.cc
happyhorse-1.0-video-edit
0.002$/callNo reference
infai.cc
happyhorse-1.0-r2v
0.002$/callNo reference
yansd666.top
happyhorse-1.0-video-edit
0.002$/callNo reference
yansd666.top
happyhorse-1.0-r2v
0.002$/callNo reference
toapis.cn
happyhorse-1.1
0.089$/sNo reference
kie.ai
HappyHorse-1.1 · reference-to-video, 720p
0.113$/sNo reference
kie.ai
HappyHorse-1.0 · text-to-video, 720p
0.140$/sNo reference
kie.ai
HappyHorse-1.1 · reference-to-video, 1080p
0.145$/sNo reference
kie.ai
HappyHorse-1.0 · text-to-video, 1080p
0.240$/sNo reference

FAQ

What is the official API price for HappyHorse?
The vendor has not published a scrapeable pricing page, or we haven't integrated it yet; until then relay quotes are listed without ratios.
How do per-call relay quotes compare with official per-second prices?
Per-call quotes are divided by the family's published default clip length (see methodology) to get a per-second price; the assumption is shown next to each row. The conversion is arithmetic only and says nothing about the site's actual clip length.
Why feature only the latest two generations?
Older versions usually have lower official prices, so comparing an old-version quote against a new-version reference would distort the ratio; older entries are collapsed below and labelled with their version.
This is an arithmetic ratio. It is not an accusation against the vendor, and a lower public source not yet indexed here may exist.